Speaking of that, though, the Post says it will conduct an internal investigation of it’s own salon plans and how they got to be the way they did.
Given that Publisher Katherine Weymouth has refused to fall on the sword herself, and still isn’t:
Weymouth said she was on vacation last week and did not see the invitation that was sent out in her name
(As if the flier invitation is the only thing wrong about this)
And Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli really can’t be as ignorant of what happened as he claims, it’s clear that “internal investigation” means scapegoat searching.
Let’s let Post political reporter Dan Balz talk about that:
“I think everyone still has questions about how this collective breakdown occurred. This was not just two people in a room. There were a number of discussions about it. That part concerned me. Everyone knows the dinners were a bad idea.”
It appears new marketing exec Charles Pelton, already fingered for the fliers about the salons, would be scapegoating target No. 1.
That said, how different is this from newspapers spiking, toning down, delaying, or otherwise bollixing up stories for fear of offending major advertisers?
Not much. So, in that sense, this is nothing new.
No comments:
Post a Comment